So, I've been thinking (and tweeting, as some may have seen) a little bit about the way people review. I love constructive criticism. Love it. I love knowing where people think I could've done better, or what does and doesn't resonate with a reader. I desperately want to get better as a writer, and as a result, all useful feedback is welcome.
But then there's those other reviews. The person who tells you you're "dumb," or that they "hate" your characters, or that you should die in a fire because your flawed characters are flawed. Or the review where you think ... but that didn't happen ... are they reviewing the story I wrote?
Here's my current philosophy in regards to reviewing:
There is absolutely nothing you need to say in a review that cannot be said graciously. And if you can't manage that, flounce quietly.
So ... what do you think?
Am I being naïve in my expectations?
Writers - what do you want in a review? What's helpful? What's not?
Readers - when you're really upset by a chapter/story/character, how do you review? Also, if you write this review, how do you expect the author to respond to you?
Come talk to me inside.
Let's play nice, too. No naming and shaming necessary.
Some recs for your time:
Beneath This Sky: Nineteen years ago, time unraveled. In a changed world, Bella fights to save a man from the past and a girl with no future. AU.
Marked Indelibly: For 4 years they've been "the tattoo guy" and "the florist" to one another. When their paths finally converge can he help her heal from a painful past? Can she him? Em/R surrounded by a mixed cast of characters. Edward on call for comic relief. AH/AU
Two Weeks: Based on 'One Week' by Barenaked Ladies. It's been one week since she looked at him, threw her arms in the air and said, "You're crazy." Edward is in trouble with his girlfriend and her parents. Will he learn to swallow his pride and overcome his fears? Will helping his sister through troubles of her own help Edward to face his? E/B, A/J This is their Much Ado About Nothing.