Today as I kicked back with my wheatgrass smoothie for lunch with my free paper, The Shepherd Express (a staple in Emibella's life), I stumbled upon David Luhrsson's review of New Moon.
In general I avoid reviews for anything Twilight related. As someone who studied Literary criticism and enjoys reading about film with a critical eye, I have found that all too often can start to view my guilty pleasures with a narrower lens than need be.
So I cautiously read Mr. Luhrsson's review waiting for the inevitable to find that he did indeed LIKE the movie and I am so glad that I did because it opened up so many themes that popular critics and casual viewers often forget about.
He wrote the following:
"But he [Cullen] demurs, not wanting to take her on a step from which she can never turn back. Romance is the dream of love, compounded by eroticism that can never find release. Becoming a vampire is, as marriage once was, a bond for eternity. And in our essentially unromantic society, the message is clear: there is something to be learned, and gained, from delayed gratification."
I ask you:
Can you justify Bella's desire to die for Edward (either by her admission that she would give her life for Edwards, or by becoming a vampire) against her fear of commitment and marriage?
She says in the books that it is because of her age and her parents. But isn't dying or becoming a vampire much worse?
Do you think this was just a literary device used by Stephenie Meyer or do you think this was really a message she was sending out about the devaluing of marriage as a bond for eternity?
If you are closer to Bella's age than to say, Stephenie Meyer's, is this how YOU feel about marriage?
Is this delayed gratification that the author of this review speaks of the underlying message, then?
GIVE ME YOUR THOUGHTS ON COMMITMENT, MARRIAGE, FAMILY, EROTIC RELEASE and HOW IT RELATES TO THE SAGA IN THE BOOKS OR IN THE MOVIES and YOUR LIFE.
Source: New Moon Rising