Okay, so I was talking to a dear friend of mine today, and somehow, KStew came up in the conversation. It went like this :
Friend : I think The Runaways is my fav movie now. I watched it like 3 times.
Me : Yeah, me too! Kristen had the Joan Jett look down to perfect.
Friend : Yeah, even the microscopic boobs.
Yes, she said 'microscopic'.
Okay, so maybe our beloved KStew doesn't have huge ones, but hey. They are definitely not 'microscopic'.
In fact, many women have averagely sized, or even small boobs. It's not a big deal. And the friend who said that? She has mini-microsciopic boobs ( I'm sure that's not a word, but let's just pretend it is, okay?). Kristen herself has made fun of her assets on talk shows, so what the heck is the matter?
You want huge boobs? Go look at Pamela Anderson or Heidi Montag or someone else who has had at least 5 boob jobs done.
Aaaaaaaand. If you take your critical eyes off her upper torso, and look down. You will see. Legs, legs, and more legs.
So look at that. Those long, shaped, awesome legs.
I know I'm being creepy, forgive me.
I know I'm right in this case, pardon my arrogance, but isn't it true?
So, what do you'll think ladies ( and men, if any) ?
Do you think her assets are small? Or that her amazing legs should be noticed more than them?