I've kind of been obsessing about The Consequence of Miracles again. I couldn't figure out why, but I suspect that it might have something to do with the excitement about Outlander, the release of the latest Outlander book, and all the excitement surrounding Starz upcoming Outlander series (AUGUST 9TH, CAMPERS!!).
What the H*** does one have to do with the other, you might be asking yourself?!
POTENTIAL SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVEN'T READ CofM OR OUTLANDER! You've been warned.
For one thing, both stories are centered around the fallout associated with the severe abuse of a much loved character, and the effect it has on that character and those who love him. The circumstances of the abuse are not even close to identical, but some of the major themes are including those of forgiveness, motive, a person's capacity for survival, courage and so on. Both stories hit me right in the gut and made me FEEL and THINK and that's a hallmark of a d@mn good writer, if you ask me (you didn't? so sorry!).
Usually as I read, I ask myself questions about why an author did this or had a character say that. One of the things that I love about this fandom is that we have the opportunity to talk to our authors and peek inside their heads. So many of you writers have been so awesome in answering our questions and helping us understand elements of your stories!
Diana Gabaldon, god bless her her little heart, does this sometimes. Today I stumbled across a compilation of posts she wrote on her writer's forum in response to readers' questions about Black Jack Randall and the events at Wentworth. Some I'd seen before, but many I hadn't. If I can ever work up the nerve to read the Wentworth scenes again, I've no doubt it will now read a bit differently. One quote in particular stands out:
(DG is explaining a scene that was horrible but not graphic):
"it _is_ so shocking precisely because we never look straight at it. Things seen from the corner of the eye are much more frightening than a monster in full view --and by giving the reader only those small, horrid glimpses, you take hold of the most powerful tool any writer has--the reader's imagination."
This was used to particularly good effect in CofM, imo. What the author didn't tell us left us to fill in the blanks, and it was horrifying.
There is a point to all this long-windedness (finally! yes?).
1) Do you appreciate insight from an author or would you rather be left to interpret things on your own?
2) Do you agree that sometimes the most effective scenes are the ones that leave the reader to draw their own conclusions, or do you prefer a lot of description?
3) For Outlander fans particularly, if you've read the DG quotes mentioned here, did it change your view on BJR and Wentworth? If so, was it for better or worse? Was her explanation pretty much what you'd concluded on your own?